In der folgende Liste sehen Sie als Kunde die Liste der Favoriten an 243 vs 308… 243 VS 308 Discussion in 'Guns & Ammo' started by gunsmoke71, Nov 24, 2006. On average, the .308 Winchester can produce a bullet energy of around 2,500 feet per pounds. It all depends on the quality of the cartridge as well. This cartridge provides incredible trajectories with only 3″ of bullet drop at 200 yards. There are several interesting talking points we can harp on from this graph. All of the .308 rounds still have higher SDs, but their sectional densities are only around 1-3 hundredths more. There are several factors that influence the recoil energy. This round is affordable which is an important consideration when you plan burning through quite a few out on the range. Both of these cartridges are fairly prevalent on the market. Let’s compare these two rounds in greater detail: Join 70,000 Readers For Our Weekly Discounts. .243 vs .30-06; If you have lung tissue you should have a dead deer within 60 yards, More likely 40 yards. When the data was calculated we used the muzzle velocity for each round, the bullet weight, the gun weight, and the powder charge. The two calibers overlap when it comes to hunting deer, as both are adequate for bringing a whitetail or mule deer down. There is quite a wide range for both of these cartridges. On average, the .308 Winchester is producing right around eleven more ft.lbs of force than the .243 Win rounds. When looking at the .243 vs .308 cartridges, there are certain situations where one cartridge excels over the other, but it all depends on the circumstances and your personal preferences as to which you enjoy shooting and are more comfortable and confident with using. 基本的に243弾は243弾を使用するように絞られた308ウィンチェスター（7.62x51）なので、243はまだかなり大きなラウンドです。 308の大きな問題は、弾薬が重く、反動が大きかったことです。 対照的に、5.56x45 /.223レミントンは軽量で、反動が比較的穏やかです。 The only time the recoil will feel more minimal is if you use a lighter .243 rifle and a heavier .308 rifle. Both the .243 and the .308 are tremendous cartridges that are widely abundant to come by and are pretty versatile when it comes to different shooting scenarios. As a result, these two rounds share more in common than you may have initially anticipated. Because stopping power is a culmination of a lot of different factors, we donât ever try to get into the argument of which metric is the best indicator of a rounds stopping power. You will find the data in the table below and note that the recoil data was generated using the same variables that we discussed earlier. I ve had a go with .308 and I'm sure it will more than do all uk species. And that seems to be a trend between these two cartridges when looking at how they compare in the components of stopping power. Re: .308 vs .243 Mensaje por guidoi » Lun May 03, 2010 8:04 am Desde el punto de vista legal con el 243 ya estas muuy limitado a caza menor o varmint, si quiero hacer varmint me compro un 223 o un 22-250 . Regarding price, the .243 round is on average cheaper than the .308. The bullet drop on this round is second to none when it comes to .243 factory loads. What this cartridge offered was a long range hunting round that was able to take lighter bullets that were more suitable for target shooting and varmint hunting. BALLISTIC ANALYSIS. I don’t think you will get the benefit of a .243 out of a gasser. Receive our newsletter with the best articles covering guides, guns & gear. The .243 comes in a wide range of bullet sizes and makes it a pretty versatile gun in the hunting world for the type of game it can effectively be used against. Please note, the following information reflects the estimated average ballistics for each caliber and does not pertain to a particular manufacturer, bullet weight, If we look at the heavier .243 rounds, there is not a whole lot of difference between the .308 rounds. Allan They provide you with greater range and power over either a .223 or .243 while also having the ability to conduct tactical reloads thanks to detachable magazines. You have a much better chance of hitting a little brush and still be able to punch the bullet home on the target and the high momentum of the bulletâs helps it in this regard. Data were acquired in the same manner as the short range trajectory, but we carried the graph out to 500 yards (Graph 7). These rounds have been on the market for over 50 years, and there is no reason why they won’t continue to be a mainstay in small firearm ammunition. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. The ballistic coefficient is not everything when it comes to having a true flying bullet. A 20" barrel really cuts it's balls off, in the high 2700's with 105 Amax. There are .243 rounds that maintain supersonic speed through the 1,000 yard mark and there are .308 rounds that fall below supersonic speeds closer to the 700 yard mark. Velocity is also important in the terminal ballistics of a round as it influences the bulletâs energy as well as how the bullet will expand on impact. 243 Winchester Overview. So in other words, you’re definitely going to feel a significant difference when you fire these two cartridges. Learn what your requirements are and then pick a round to match your hunting style and environment. We see that all of the .308 Win rounds leave the muzzle with over 60lbs/ft.s of momentum, several closer to 70, while the .243 rounds, besides the 55 and 58gr rounds, hover near the 40lbs/ft.s mark. (25 at 4000) 8.5: 1.6: 3.5.204 Ruger (33 at 4225) While they are very fast rounds, we saw that they bled velocity quickly. The .243 ammunition is cheaper than the .308, and it’s flat trajectory and high speeds make it a fun and affordable round to use on the range. For all the features the two cartridges share, there are some significant differences that are important to understanding. We see that the rounds of each specific cartridge group pretty tightly together though the .243 rounds seem to split into two groups. For the sake of clarity, we are not going to graph all of that data, but it should show that the selections we have made is a fair representation. BONUS OFFER: Get your 500 Page Ammo Comparison Handbook (worth $43) for FREE right into your inbox. So even though the light .243 rounds has a slightly flatter trajectory than the .308, itâs not as pronounced as one might think. They ran high twist barrels way back then. Thread starter WannaShoot18; Start date Jun 10, 2008; WannaShoot18. The internet has made it much easier to find the specific round of either cartridge you fall in love with, but often these rarer cartridges are going to cost a pretty penny. The .243 Win also has a pretty rich history in the long range shooting community. The .308 produces significantly more recoil than the .243 4. If you could only own one over the other, chances are good you would find more practical use for the .308 round, simply because it’s a longer distance shooting round and can be used to hunt almost anything in North America. Best 9mm Ammo 2019 [Self-Defense & Target], 6.5 Creedmoor vs .243 Win – Cartridge Comparison, Best .40 S&W Ammo: Self Defense & Target Practice. Besides those differences, these two cartridges have very similar case dimensions such as the base diameter, case length, overall length, and the case capacity. Furthermore, the .308 preserves its energy at longer distances as well. Sectional density is derived from SD along with velocity and bullet type all factor into penetration, and we will discuss how it all ties together in the application section. The .243 was developed as a descendant of the .308. We all have killed deer with it and it is deadon. Any factory load you get for the .308 Win is going to produce more recoil than a .243 Win round. Therefore, we have some sleek choices at our disposal. The differences in velocity between these rounds depends on the individual round. Pushing its 20-degree-angle shoulder to Ackleyâs 40-degrees would create enough additional powder space to add perhaps 50- to 100 fps to most bullets. .308 is ubiquitous and accurate and efficient - but the best .260 Remington (6.5mm-08) and .243 (6mm-08) bullets fly "better" past about 700 yards, making long shot placement easier. And while there are also several .243 rounds that have a sectional density closer to the .308 average and there are a couple .308 rounds that do not have as high a sectional density as some .243 Win rounds, you are generally going to have more options for high sectional densities with the .308 Win. It’s been widely accepted by military and police marksmen, sharpshooters, and snipers. To generate data from a ballistic calculator we used the rounds BC, muzzle velocity, and bullet weight (Graph 6). And we would expect this trend given the similarities in velocity between the rounds, barring the two lightweight .243 rounds, and the increased bullet weights of the .308 rounds. A lot of this also has to do with the rifles chambered Itâs much more than just a short range cartridge. Just because of the nature of these two cartridges, there is some difference between the bullet weights of these two rounds that we have no control over. This is the theory behind sectional density. Furthermore, there are a wider variety of .308 bullet types available as well. So while the numbers we present might fluctuate depending on the actual powder charge used by the manufacturer (not provided) or what your rifle weighs, the general trends are safe to draw conclusions from. Letâs look at a crude example. Because of this, we want to compare the short-range trajectories of our selected ten rounds. The .243 rounds have the flattest performing rounds with the 55 and 58gr bullets. Yes, I would also consider 7mm-08..243 is plentiful, but prone to rapid barrel wear and from what I read tends to be more finicky in matching load to barrel. There's a lot of debate as to what the best deer rifle is, but the .243 definitely has it going on. I have a 204 savage 12 that needs to be switched. This difference between the cartridges remains the same as the rounds move downrange though the amount of difference between the two cartridges does drop to only 17lbs/ft.s when we donât include the 55 and 58gr rounds. Where we start to see major differences in the performance of these cartridge is at the 700 yard mark and beyond. The.243 is more of an overbore cartridge and is not as efficient with powder. This will only be the case if you are using a heavy bullet with a rifle with a slow twist rate. This round has high velocities, but it does bleed off speed at a high rate, and by the time you get out to 500 yards and beyond, it doesn’t perform any better than other rounds regarding velocity. The .308 kicks like a mule compared to the .243. A .243 can travel quite far and this rifle proves that it can be done so long as you sight in the scope properly. Regardless of the difference, every round shows less than 5 inches of bullet drop at the 200-yard mark. Discussion Starter â¢ #1 â¢ Feb 6, 2014. With heavier bullets, you will have to compensate for elevation loss, but you can always improve this by going with a slightly lighter bullet or higher pressured round. The BC is simply a rating that is derived from an equation that uses multiple cartridge/bullet variables. Within 200 yards, both of these cartridges can be nail drivers given their trajectory at these ranges. Trotz der Tatsache, dass die Meinungen dort ab und zu nicht ganz objektiv sind, bringen sie ganz allgemein eine gute Orientierungshilfe These are the ranges that are most often encountered in hunting scenarios. Have a look at .308 Win vs 30-06 Springfield and points out the differences between the two. And while the .243 might appear to be a clear-cut winner there is more that you have to consider depending on what you are doing. NY White Tail Deer: .243 vs .270 vs .308 vs 30-06 05-13-2016, 02:36 PM I'm trying to buy my first deer gun and I thought I was set on .308, but now I'm not positive. For our top .308 Win range round we like the 168gr Hornady BTHP Match. I've been saving up for a .260 CTR, but I'm thinking that at this price ($460) I should jump on a â¦ Similarly, the 308 Winchester is regarded as a decided improvement over the 30-30, since it throws the same.308 caliber bullets, but much faster. When we look at the BCs of these two rounds we see that the .308 round, at least from this selection of rounds, has higher ballistic coefficients. 243: 6.8mm Rem. Not to discount the .243 as does carry adequate energy … Basically, the .308 Winchester round is simply a civilian version of the 7.62x51mm NATO round, which was originally developed for the M14 rifle. We see that there is less than an inch of difference in bullet drop between these two rounds out to the 350-yard mark. By increasing the bullet weight, you also have a tremendous whitetail cartridge as well that we think is just as efficient as the .308 with its high velocity and penetration. We kept the gun weight constant at 7lbs and used the average for several popular powder brands provided by Nosler load data for each cartridge. Had a heavy barrel 308 DPMS too. So for momentum, the higher the number, the more resistance the bullet can encounter while still moving forward. Less recoil, plenty of power for deer, flat shooting. The .308 is a 30 caliber bullet and lends itself very well to both big game hunting and precision shooting. Letâs take a look at the short range numbers when we add more rounds, especially with the .243 Win rounds with heavier bullet weights. We see that the lightweight .243 rounds have a significantly smaller SD than the heavier .243 rounds. The shell casing was designed to ease case extraction and cartridge feeding in bolt action rifles as well as machine guns. And the same goes for .243 rounds though the issue often arises when handloading the cartridge too hot. Any data set that you work with is going to have outliers and the .243 Win rounds do have several of those. For a cartridge comparison such as the .243 vs .308, potential users want to see which has a flatter trajectory, meaning it shows less bullet drop. With proper shot placement, this round still has the energy and the velocity to make a clean kill. We may earn a commission when you purchase through one of our links. 243 rules for that. From the muzzle, we are looking at nearly a 1,000ft.lbs difference in the averages of the two cartridges. We again see that the .243 Win rounds come out of the muzzle with significantly more velocity than the .308 Win rounds with almost 500 fps difference. Of course, the energy generated is going to vary from round to round even within the same cartridge type. With nine ft.lbs of difference between the two, even an experienced shooter is going to feel the difference between these two cartridges. There are some key differences between the two modern cases. both are able to shoot 1000 yds, but which one is the better caliber and why? In fact, there are very few big game animals in the world that cannot be comfortably brought down with a .308. There are several reasons to look at the bullet velocity from the muzzle as it moves downrange. There are good reasons why the .243 remains at the top of the heap; it is nothing more and nothing less than the .308 Winchester necked down to hold .243-inch diameter bullets. For the .308 Win, we like the Nosler Ballistic Tip 165gr. This is another point of comparison with the .243 vs .308 that a lot of hunters or marksman often search for when trying to decide on a cartridge. All of the rounds we have compiled are listed at the end of the article. Ballistics is an important concept for anyone shooting a rifle, regardless of the application, but they can also be complicated by a lot of factors influencing each performance category. The .243 rounds all have muzzle energies between 1,700 and 2,000ft.lbs at the muzzle but drop below the 1,000ft.lb mark by 400 yards. .243 vs .308 A local sporting goods store is having a sale on their Tikka T3 Lites. 243 will be 4 dollars ahundred cheaper to load than the 308 useing a sierra gameking as a bullet choice. (20.9 at 700 yards and 28.6 at 1000 yards). Meanwhile the poor little 243 Winchester, which is the 308 Winchester case necked down to accept 243-caliber bullets, is suspect. Some of which include bullet design, which influences penetration and wound type, and perhaps the most important component to stopping power, shot placement. (Graph 2). Once you move out to longer ranges, the .243 showed a slight advantage over the .308 with a less pronounced bullet drop. 243 vs 308 The 243 shoots lighter and smaller diameter bullets at a higher velocity. Heck, the .308 Winchester is so much larger that it can almost fit an entire .223 Remington cartridge inside its … 13,554. In this graph, we take a look at our ten rounds and see how they compare and if the same trend continues from what we saw in the previous graph. These two cartridges are not often used in home defense settings, so we will focus on knockdown power regarding hunting scenarios. 6.5 creedmoor with 107 or 123 is not far beyond 243 with 108s. As hunting season approaches every year, we look toward our gun cabinets and wonder if we're really using the best deer rifle. Penetration refers to how far the bullet will travel once it strikes its target. This is another excellent option for medium to larger game. The trajectory of the bullet is often one of the most discussed and scrutinized ballistic components. None of the other components do us much good if the round isnât put where it can do some damage. Where it may cause some pause when considering the .308 based on recoil is if it is for someone just getting into shooting and hunting or a younger outdoorsman. 243 VS 308. For any major retailer, they are going to have both .243 and .308 rounds in stock and usually have a variety of options for both cartridges. Like at the 200-yard mark, the lightweight .243 rounds are nearly five inches flatter than the next closest round. The difference shrinks as the rounds move downrange but the advantage still clearly belongs to the .308 rounds. 6.5 Creed with 140s is approx 1/2 way between the heavy 6mm and 308 with 150s. Thatâs a case capacity difference of 20.07% favoring the .25-06 Remington. Weâll get into some other important performance factors for hunting shortly. From a hunting perspective, how well will these bullets penetrate. Poor stabilization can throw off the trajectory that you have sent the bullet on. We also see that as the distance increases, the difference between the two cartridges increases. We look and compare each individually for the sake of simplicity, but all factor into the performance of the bullet and the cartridge as a whole. And we realize that most of you are already aware of what we are about to say, but trajectory is far from the only performance spec that needs to be considered when thinking about a cartridge you are wanting to use. Page 2 of 2 < Prev 1 2. The Nosler Ballistic Tip bullet is one of our favorites for deer sized game. The above numbers indicate quite a significant difference between these two cartridges. While the .308 does have a history in tactical applications as well, it is not often enough for us to focus on that area either, especially with our second cartridge being the .243 Win. The 20-degree shoulder of the parent is maintained, and the 2.045-inch case launches a 100-grain bullet at a muzzle velocity of right around 3000 fps. Just to try and have a better understanding of how exactly this number we calculate has anything to do with how well a bullet will penetrate. For most medium size game, 1,000ft.lbs of energy is the recommended amount, and this increases the larger the animal gets. Because of that, we will take a look at these rounds long-range trajectories. For the .243, youâre looking more at an average price of $30 for a box of 20 rounds. We definitely see from this graph that these two cartridges look to behave differently. We were curious about this as well and had to go back in and double check. Brass is cheaper for 308 . In the ballistics section, we will focus on the differences in velocity, ballistic coefficients, and trajectory. Learn the history of 243 ammo and visit us at https://ammo.com/rifle/243-ammo to get the best discount 243 ammo online. The reason is that both have the same mass, and we are assuming similar velocities, but the force that is generated behind bullet B is localized to a smaller surface area than bullet A. We have bullet A at 100gr and a .300 bullet diameter. I think you would be much happier using the tried and true 308. Very helpful. While we agree that energy is important, we also think shot placement is as important if not more. It didn't shoot the best but it was a cheap factory rifle. The .243 is a necked down version of the .308 which allows it to take the smaller diameter bullet, the .243. Our next metric, bullet momentum, is also intrinsically tied with the sectional density when it comes to penetration. When we look at these two cartridges, there is some about 70 yards difference in the average limit. The 308 is actually the commercial designation of the 7.62x51mm NATO cartridge. And again, we are not talking about handloading here, strictly factory loads. Get our PDF with 13 pistol & rifle targets (worth $48) including expert instructions for FREE! (130 Sp at 3140).416 +2.5" +2.4" 3"@150: 305.270 Win. Besides the two lightweight .243 rounds, we see tight groupings of all the other rounds at the 300 and 400-yard marks. The.308âa fine design in and of itselfâhas been responsible for a number of successful cartridges, but the.243 has to be the most successful. With a degree in Microbiology and several years of doctoral work manipulating bacterial genes, he attempts to merge the rational and unbiased thinking of scientific research with the passions of hunting and fishing. What Could Be Improved and Why The .243 does pack some punch, and the eye relief on this scope might not be doing you any favors. I've killed a few deer with a .243 and seen several more .243 vs .30-06 killed by .243's and 6mm's.
Everyday Science Mcqs Pdf, Epoxy Primer Spray Can, Ottolenghi Fennel Orzo, Alachua County Property Tax Search By Name, How Late Is Too Late For Husband To Stay Out, Chakra Bracelet Meaning, Haunting Folk Albums,